Founder POV3 min read

Affiliate Links vs Brand Partnerships: What Pays Content Creators More Over Time?

Brand partnerships feel bigger, but affiliate links often compound quietly. This post breaks down how each pays, where creators get stuck, and why long-term earnings are usually misunderstood.

Affiliate Links vs Brand Partnerships: What Pays Content Creators More Over Time?
Written by
Chris Tomshack
Published on
Dec 21, 2025

If you’re a content creator, brand partnerships usually feel like the goal.

They’re visible.
They’re negotiated.
They come with contracts, deliverables, and deadlines.

Affiliate links, on the other hand, feel smaller. Quieter. Less official.

Because of that, many creators assume brand partnerships are the “real” money — and affiliate links are secondary.

That assumption is where things get interesting.

What brand partnerships actually pay you for

Brand partnerships pay for distribution.

You agree to:

  • create specific content
  • post on a timeline
  • deliver reach and exposure

In return, you get:

  • a fixed payout
  • clear expectations
  • predictable short-term income

That’s not a bad thing.

Brand deals are often:

  • the first meaningful creator income
  • a confidence boost
  • a validation milestone

But they’re also episodic.

When the campaign ends, the income stops.

What affiliate links actually pay you for

Affiliate links pay for outcomes.

They don’t care when you posted.
They don’t care how polished the content was.
They only care whether a recommendation leads to a purchase.

That means affiliate income:

  • doesn’t turn off when the post ages
  • isn’t tied to a campaign window
  • compounds quietly over time

The same recommendation can keep paying you months — or years — later.

Why brand partnerships feel bigger (even when they’re not)

There’s a psychological mismatch here.

Brand deals:

  • show up as lump sums
  • arrive in your inbox
  • feel tangible

Affiliate income:

  • trickles in
  • accumulates gradually
  • doesn’t announce itself loudly

So creators tend to overweight what’s visible and underweight what compounds.

That’s human.

But it leads to a distorted view of what actually pays over time.

Where creators usually get stuck

Most creators don’t choose one or the other.

They do both — but they treat them incorrectly.

Common patterns:

  • brand deals get prioritized and optimized
  • affiliate links are added casually
  • attribution is an afterthought
  • systems never get built

So affiliate links underperform, reinforcing the belief that:

“Brand deals are where the real money is.”

In reality, affiliate links are often underperforming because they’re unsupported — not because they’re weaker.

The compounding effect most creators underestimate

Here’s the part that’s easy to miss:

Affiliate links benefit disproportionately from:

  • trust built over time
  • content that stays relevant
  • recommendations that age well

Brand deals don’t.

A brand partnership might pay well once.
An affiliate link might pay modestly — but repeatedly.

Over a long enough timeline, the math changes.

The real tradeoff isn’t money — it’s leverage

Brand partnerships require:

  • negotiation
  • back-and-forth
  • approval cycles
  • new work every time

Affiliate links require:

  • good recommendations
  • clean attribution
  • systems that persist

One scales with effort.
The other scales with infrastructure.

That’s the real distinction.

Why this leads back to systems (again)

If affiliate links are scattered, buried, or expire unnoticed, they’ll never compete with brand deals.

Creators then compensate by:

  • chasing more partnerships
  • filling calendars with campaigns
  • trading time for income

That works — until it doesn’t.

Without systems, affiliate links never get the chance to do what they’re good at.

Where Aardvark fits into this picture

This isn’t an argument against brand partnerships.

It’s an argument for balance — and for infrastructure.

Creators shouldn’t have to choose between:

  • short-term payouts
  • long-term compounding

Aardvark exists to make affiliate attribution persistent, visible, and timely — so creators don’t have to keep trading effort for income.

Brand deals still matter.
Affiliate links just need the chance to compound.

Key takeaways

  • Brand partnerships pay for distribution.
  • Affiliate links pay for outcomes.
  • Brand deals feel bigger because they’re visible.
  • Affiliate links compound quietly over time.
  • Without systems, affiliate links never reach their potential.

Aardvark creator playbook

Get new breakdowns on creator deals, monetization systems, and brand partnerships in your inbox.

Read about our privacy policy.

Keep exploring

View all posts
Design a Link in Bio that Converts
Founder POV
Design a Link in Bio that Converts

Learn how to design a link in bio that actually converts—by showcasing creator deals clearly, guiding attention, and giving your recommendations a place to work over time.

Aardvark Team
Aardvark Team
Launch Your First Aardvark Deal
Founder POV
Launch Your First Aardvark Deal

Adding creator deals is what allows your recommendations to work around the clock. This guide explains what creator deals are, why they matter, and how to add your first one in Aardvark.

Aardvark Team
Aardvark Team
The Creator Commerce Stack: Tools Content Creators Actually Need (and What They Don’t)
Founder POV
The Creator Commerce Stack: Tools Content Creators Actually Need (and What They Don’t)

Most creators don’t need more tools—they need fewer, better ones. This post breaks down the creator commerce stack, what actually matters, and what most creators can skip.

Chris Tomshack
Chris Tomshack